BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                          SB 592
                                                          Page  1

Date of Hearing:   July 12, 1999

        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION 
                       Herb Wesson, Chair
           SB 592 (Morrow) - As Amended:  May 28, 1999

  SENATE VOTE  :   33-1
  
SUBJECT  :   Horse racing:  possessory interest tax offset

  SUMMARY  :   Reimburses the City of Del Mar for revenues lost as a  
result of the County of San Diego's imposition of possessory  
interest taxes on the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club.  Specifically,  
  this bill  , an urgency measure:

1)States that it is the intent of the Legislature to offset the  
  fiscal impact resulting from a prior legislative act that had  
  an adverse fiscal effect on cities in San Diego County that  
  host race meetings or allow for the operation of satellite  
  wagering facilities. 

2)Appropriates for the 1999-2000 fiscal year an unspecified  
  amount of money from the State General Fund to the Controller,  
  as specified, in order to reimburse cities in San Diego County  
  for revenues lost by the city since a 1995 change in law (AB  
  304,Tucker, Ch. 959), that reduced the city's share of  
  horseracing revenues.  The amount of the reimbursement must be  
  equal to the total amount of possessory interest tax  
  reimbursement for which valid claims are submitted. 

3)Declares that, due to unique circumstances pertaining to  
  cities in San Diego County that this bill is intended to  
  remedy, a general statute within the meaning of specified  
  provisions of the California Constitution cannot be made  
  applicable and a special statute is necessary.

  EXISTING LAW  :

1)Authorizes every racing association or fair that conducts a  
  race meeting or that operates a satellite wagering facility to  
  deduct up to 0.33 of 1% from the total wagers placed at the  
  location for the purpose of payment of possessory interest  
  taxes, if any, assessed against the racing association or  
  fair.  The amounts remaining after the payment of such taxes  
  must be distributed to the respective local government in  








                                                          SB 592
                                                          Page  2

  which the race meeting or wagering is conducted.  

2)If a city or county has elected by ordinance to receive a  
  distribution from a racing association or fair in this regard,  
  the local government may not collect any license or excise tax  
  or fee levied solely upon the racing association or fair  
  conducting the racing meeting or operating the satellite  
  wagering facility.  Further, a local government electing to  
  receive this distribution must provide ordinary and  
  traditional municipal services, such as police and traffic  
  control, in connection with the racing meeting or satellite  
  wagering.

 FISCAL EFFECT  :   General Fund cost of approximately $175,000

  COMMENTS  :   

1.   Background  .  The Del Mar Thoroughbred Club is a private  
entity which leases the 22nd District Agricultural Association's  
Del Mar fairgrounds in order to conduct its annual seven-week  
race meeting.  The Del Mar race meet features some of the best  
horse racing in the world and is one of the top performing race  
meets in the country in terms of on-track attendance, average  
purses, and daily average wagering handle. 
  
  In 1993, the track's original grandstand was replaced with an  
$80 million facility that doubled its capacity and produced  
other significant capital improvements.  Following the  
completion of the new grandstand, the San Diego County Assessor  
increased the possessory interest tax assessment on the fair's  
facilities from a pre-1990 amount of approximately $25,000 to  
approximately $600,000.  (Current law subjects private  
individuals or businesses which own or control structures on  
government-owned property to possessory interest property taxes  
based on the value of the structure).  The Del Mar Thoroughbred  
Club subsequently  contested this matter in order to determine  
whether the Club was obligated to pay a possessory interest tax  
for the use of the Del Mar fair's grandstand, which resulted in  
a settlement with the assessor whereby the Club was required to  
pay an amount of approximately $175,000 per year in possessory  
interest tax to the County of San Diego.

As earlier noted, existing law authorizes horse racing  
associations, either through on-site or satellite wagering, to  
pay  0.33 of 1% of their pari-mutuel wagers to local governments  








                                                          SB 592
                                                          Page  3

as a license fee in lieu of paying locally imposed license or  
excise taxes or fees.  This law is intended to ensure that  all   
local taxes are waived when a city or county accepts a  
percentage of the racing wagers.   In 1995, the law was changed  
to allow horse racing associations and satellite wagering  
facilities to pay their possessory interest taxes from the  
revenues that would otherwise go to the host city as part of the  
local license fees.   This was done to clarify that the  
imposition (and payment) of possessory interest taxes, which  
according to the supporters of that bill was becoming more  
commonplace, must come from the local government portion and not  
assessed separately upon the racing association.

The City of Del Mar notes that this 1995 change in law resulted  
in a reduction in revenues in the amount of  $175,000 from the  
amount of revenues the city otherwise would have been entitled  
to receive.  The city further argues that the County of San  
Diego, rather than the city, imposed the tax on the Club and  
that therefore it is unfair for the city to not receive revenues  
that are intended to compensate the city for racing-related  
services rendered such as traffic control, police services, etc.  
 

2.   Previous legislation  .   AB 378 (Morrow) from the 1997-98  
legislative session, would have likewise compensated the City of  
Del Mar for the loss of revenue resulting from the Del Mar  
Thoroughbred Club's use of revenues to pay its possessory  
interest taxes owned to the County of San Diego that otherwise  
would have been provided to the city.  This bill was vetoed by  
Governor Wilson, whose veto message in part stated:

"The City of Del Mar agreed to accept horse racing wagers in  
lieu of taxing the racing association.  Subsequently, the County  
of San Diego levied a possessory interest tax upon the  
association.  Then, in 1995, AB 304 (Tucker, Ch. 959) was  
enacted to clarify that when a possessory interest tax is levied  
upon a private horse racing association for use of a publicly  
owned fairground, the possessory interest taxes shall be  
deducted from the percentage of wagers allocated to local  
governments.  While that measure results in a significant loss  
of revenues for the City of Del Mar, it maintains the original  
intent of the law that local governments accept horse racing  
dollars in exchange for not levying taxes. This bill would  
totally undercut the agreement embodied in the law."









                                                          SB 592
                                                          Page  4

  REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

  Support  

City of Del Mar (sponsor)
  
Opposition  

None registered

  Analysis Prepared by  :    George Wiley / G. O. / (916) 319-2531